[eal-bilingual] Delegation to schools

General response is that Yes/No won't do it as there are pros and cons which need explanation... S 

Sara Green
Head of Language Development Service
Family and Children's Services
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Isaac Newton PDC
108a Lancaster Road
London W11 1QS

Tel: 020 7598 4817
Fax:020 7598 4808
Mobile: 07971 327479

sara.green at rbkc.gov.uk

EAL 14-19 website:  www.rbkc.gov.uk/eal14to19
RBKC website: www.rbkc.gov.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: eal-bilingual-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk [mailto:eal-bilingual-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk] On Behalf Of real.public
Sent: 16 July 2008 14:06
To: For practitioners involved in teaching pupils from ethnic andlinguisticminorities
Subject: [eal-bilingual] Delegation to schools

Dear colleagues in England,

Please could as many of you as possible respond to this very quick request with a simple YES or NO direct to my email address real.public at btinternet.com NOT to the forum?

Aside from individual schools where good working relationships have yielded positive results, as a whole would you say that delegation of EMAG funding to schools, rather than funding being retained by central LEA services, is beneficial for the pupils and for our profession?  On balance, a simple
YES or NO is all I need to get a general picture.

Many thanks
Jonathan Brentnall

*********************************************************** 
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.
This e-mail may contain information which is confidential, 
legally privileged and/or copyright protected. This e-mail 
is intended for the addressee only. If you receive this in 
error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
from your computer.

************************************************************ 