|
|
|
|
|
| [oats-sig] User with limited motor control | |
|
Steve Lee
steve at fullmeasure.co.uk
|
|
| Article: [oats-sig] User with limited motor control | |
|
Great, thanks for reminding me about the need for an open standard layout format, I'll stick that in the proposal. The long term goal is that this will become a general purpose tool and also be cross platform (Linux, Max, Windows), Firefox is stage 1. With embedded Linux you get low cost ACC hardware devices. Yes I think you've answered but it will be good to hear from others too. Steve On 10/19/06, Judge Simon <Simon.Judge at sbpct.nhs.uk> wrote: > It would be good if the grids were of a common standard (with SAW, The > Grid), or could import them. In fact, this 'd be essential... In fact, this > work could be a driver for standardising the storage of this information > (e.g. in XML) which is shockingly not even vaguely standard at the mo, > meaning there is no way to port resources. David has done some stuff on > suggested storage standards (in the Switch Access to Technology Resource > [1]). > > In fact, if it could do this, then users could use the same resources inside > Firefox/Thunderbird to type etc, then use SAW/Grid etc for outside... Thus > heading towards a browser based AAC/Access system... (sorry, getting > excited!). > > Accessibility Arrangements - for pointer-only-users, they'd use an on-screen > keyboard to type probably, they might also be able to speak (maybe a > seamless integration with FireVox?), er, generally with pointer-no-click > users they'd use a dwell clicker software (this could be built in?) such as > [2] - the nicer ones of these display a timer around the cursor for the > dwell time. I suppose someone could also be using an eye-gaze system etc... > > > For people who have not got fine control they generally just get away with > big icons, larger dwell areas etc. There is an anti-tremor mouse, and there > might be the equivalent software (can't remember, maybe not) but otherwise > tremor is not coped with that well... > > Is this answering the question? I'm not sure... > > The majority of the users I see are at the lower end of the input bandwidth > spectrum, so are generally not 2d pointer users, though I see a fair few > (e.g. people with MND)... > > > Cheers > > Simon > > [1] http://tinyurl.com/f8qxk > [2] http://www.sensorysoftware.com/software/dwellclick/index.html > > Clinical Scientist > ACT > 0121 627 1627 ex 53245 > > -----Original Message----- > From: oats-sig-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk > [mailto:oats-sig-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk] On Behalf Of Steve Lee > Sent: 19 October 2006 07:39 > To: OATs Project Special Interest Group > Subject: [oats-sig] User with limited motor control > > > I want to ensure that the Mozilla accessibility work is usable by as many > users with limited motor control as possible. The current plan is to provide > grids and in application selection (using actual controls) accessible by > switch or pointer. > > What sort of accessibility arrangements are used by users with some ability > to use a pointer for onscreen 2D random access (e.g. headmouse, eyetracker). > What would be better than the current possibilities? > > Do you use OSK/Grids or enlarge the screen with fine pointer resolution? I > imagine either would be useful depending on capabilities. Are there other > useful techniques adaptions? > > What if tremor is a problem? > > -- Steve Lee > www.fullmeasure.co.uk > > -- -- Steve Lee www.fullmeasure.co.uk |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |