|
|
|
|
|
| [SENco-forum] delegated funding for SEN fears | |
|
SEN at tringham.net
SEN at tringham.net
|
|
| Article: [SENco-forum] delegated funding for SEN fears | |
|
We have had devolved budgets for a long time now. It did not work in the beginning as the switchover was calculated on a lot of things but including areas of deprivation, free school meals, and existing statements. So being sandwiched between two wealthy areas didn't help, low take up of free meals even though eligible and only 2 Statemented children due to poor management and no real SENco was a disaster. The then official 30% SEN is now about 46% ( with more not identified) 5 children were Statemented post devolution - all of which had to come out of very little money due to the calculations. The school is good about not only ring fencing SEN money but adding to it from its own budget to ensure a TA in every class (woo!). With nearly 1/2 the class requiring huge differentiation and a large amount of SEBD/& AD(H)D this is a must. Does it work now? No, but this is because there just is not enough money. I don't like the Statement process as it is weighted against the child, too bureaucracy heavy and support light, but they are needed to protect vulnerable children. My own are constantly having their support nibbled at purely because the school is always saying they have children that are worse off............Not my problem. Management should be supporting or Statementing these children, but avoid it to save 'their' money. If the parent does not make a fuss it is never mentioned as an option, or in my friends case being fobbed off with reasons why the school can support their child just as well without Statementing. I agree that schools should be able to do this, but the reality is that the child is often short-changed and there is no monitoring and come back system in place when this happens. Sharon |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |