|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] delegated funding for SEN fears | |
|
Mike Boyd
mike at green43.demon.co.uk
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] delegated funding for SEN fears | |
|
On 05/12/06 23:56, "kngbrndn at aol.com" <kngbrndn at aol.com> wrote: <snipped> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6198634.stm Hmm, last three paragraphs of this story: " While sympathising with the concerns of parents like Mrs Maynard, Mr Jones from Windsor and Maidenhead council said the new approach meant more time and money being made for the pupils themselves. "There's a huge amount of work on the part of educational psychologists that goes into writing statements - there are several days' worth of work that go into writing a report for a statement. "This is time that could be spent in the school, advising on ways of adapting the curriculum, differentiating teaching methods and so on." " Here is a quote* from some of the law that governs many statementing procedures: "The advice ... shall be written advice relating to - (a) the educational, medical, psychological or other features of the case (according to the nature of the advice sought) which appear to be relevant to the child's educational needs (including his likely future needs); (b) how those features could affect the child's educational needs, and (c) the provision which is appropriate for the child in light of those features of the child's case, whether by way of special educational provision or non-educational provision" It seems to me that Mr Jones' need for "... advising on ways of adapting the curriculum, differentiating teaching methods and so on" is entirely contained within sub-paragraph (c) above. I see no potential loss of EP time here. * From regulation 7 of The Education (Special Educational Needs) (England) (Consolidation) Regulations 2001 which are to be found in the back (p151) of every copy of the SEN Code of Practice. Regards, Mike -- Mike Boyd <mike at green43.demon.co.uk> |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |