|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] Separate forum for the teaching of reading/literacy | |
|
Clare North
clare at clarenorth.co.uk
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] Separate forum for the teaching of reading/literacy | |
|
Personally I would prefer to keep one forum. Although I consider my particular 'field' to be speech & language / literacy, I still work with pupils who have a range of other difficulties. The Forum members between them have an enormous amount of expertise and I have learned much from reading the contributions of others. I am always interested to find out what I DON'T know and I find that this Forum - which addresses all types of special need issue - is really useful for me. I mainly work with KS1 & 2 (occasionally 3)but still read through the KS4 issues as I feel that I need to know what the current concerns are. I would prefer not to fragment this forum. Clare --- This email and any attachments have been scanned by AVG AntiVirus 7.5. -----Original Message----- From: senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk [mailto:senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk] On Behalf Of eddiecarron Sent: 07 December 2006 15:23 To: senco-forum at lists.becta.org.uk Subject: [senco-forum] Separate forum for the teaching of reading/literacy I have re- subscribed only to post this one message. I unsubscribed some months ago because I felt that Senco-forum members were no longer interested in my own special area which is the promotion of literacy and the initial teaching of reading. I take the view that a resolution of the initial teaching of reading issue would remove many of the ''special needs' which later emerge on the basis of the idea that prevention is always better than cure and since we are obviously not very good at delivering 'cures' anyway. Even a cursory examination of the topics discussed on the Senco forum shows that SENCo are now more concerned with the administration of illiteracy than with its remediation. Since I have no interest in its administration, I simply unsubscribed. This is not to denigrate these causes or issues - I know they are of great interest to SENCo and others but they are of no interest to me personally. I felt that by unsubscribing that would be the end of the matter. I have recently been emailed by someone who had I believe also circulated others, on the subject of the poor representation on literacy topics on the forum. This person indicated an interest in anther forum lwhich would be ring-fenced for literacy issues only and in particular, for the intitial teaching of reading to the exclusion of all else. I wondered if there would be others interested in pressing BECTa for the establishment of such a limited forum since some very interesting things are currently happening this field in which our performance is presently so abysmal compared to that of many other countries who appear to take 98% literacy as the norm whilst we have bumbled along for decades with a miserable 81%. We really do continue to allow about one child in five to leave school at sixteen, less than functionally literate. Surely this is worthy of its own debating forum? Eddie Carron |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |