|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] Assessment timescales | |
|
KngBrndn at aol.com
KngBrndn at aol.com
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] Assessment timescales | |
|
The medical assessment is a legal requirement (see CoP 7:78 / 84) and medical certification of a clean bill of health (no medical problems -- vision/hearing, etc.) is relevant as it means these aspects can be discounted as reasons for the difficulties that gave rise to the assessment and any other SEN that emerges from the EP report, etc. Delayed medical report may be posited by an LA an exceptional reason for the LA to exceed the time limits (see regulation 12 (7) [c] of the SEN Regulations 2001 -- Annexe A at the back of the CoP: page 14) but CoP 7:91 states "It is good practice for parents to be told if the exceptions apply, so that they understand the reasons for the delays". CoP 7:92 states that Health and Social Service Departments must provide information within 6 weeks and LA's must make the assessment within 10 weeks. The overall time limit from receiving a request to assess (or of an LA notifying parent of consideration to assess) and issue of final statement, is 26 weeks. CoP 7:19/20 requires the LA to advise Medical and Social Services Departments as soon as they receive a request or are considering an assessment (not to wait until a decision is made to assess) in order to give these agencies maximum time to check records and prepare to provide information so as to minimise possibility of delays. CoP 7:93 indicates the importance for the LA to keep delay to a minimum and, once a delay has been overcome, to complete the process as quickly as possible. The Health Authority was in breach of duty in not providing the required information within the 6 weeks time limit -- and staff on leave is not an exceptional reason for them to break the law. If there is future delay quote the CoP references above and, even more important, the SEN 2001 Regulations (i.e., Regulation 12). The regs must be followed by law -- CoP is considered as guidance unless the phrase "must" is used which indicates a statutory duty. Also, the LA are at liberty to arrange additional provision which is evidentially urgently required before the final statement is issued -- I have just persuaded an LA to do this even though the final statement is still being discussed by parent for changes -- the (15 hrsTA pr wk) is being funded already -- whilst there is no hope of the statement being finally issued until September. Hope this helps Brendan |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |