[SENco-forum] Re: SEN Criteria

Just because other LEA's do it does not make it right!

As a parent I faced the same problems of 'criteria or templates or whatever
they keep changing them to ensure they do not go above their 2% Statementing
quota and get fined.

- Daughter severe SpLD but IQ 141 keeping her afloat Her SAT' were
originally 2A/3 which meant the school did not have to support her & made it
plain. I was fed up with her crying all the time and once discussing suicide
as it was all too tough trying to learn in  an education system that wanted
to pretend her problems didn't exist.

We made a request for Statutory Assessment that was turned down

'bleat bleat.. not in LEA criteria.'

The SENDIST Tribunal kicked them into touch.

If the LEA don't play fair - then play dirty .  Get all parents to make
requests for assessment.  Let the LEA have the dirty job of saying who does
& doesn't deserve help.

Mad of Tonbridge.

PS I am sure you will get more balanced views!

-----Original Message-----
From: senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk
[mailto:senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk]On Behalf Of Kenny
Wheeler
Sent: 24 November 2006 17:04
To: Sen Forum
Subject: [senco-forum] Re: SEN Criteria

Question for the learned colleagues out there. The Lea in which I work has
criteria for placinf pupils on the SEN list e.g. pupils in year 7 at level
3a or 3b are deemed Action and those at 3c and below are deemed action plus.
However, they are looking to shift the parameters/goal posts with action
plus shifting to 2b or below. With funding being directly hit does anyone
out there have similarly low levels proposed or currently in place?