[senco-forum] reading and phonics

Sorry?!

I asked because it seemed to me to be remarkably supportive of  
synthetic phonics - which seemed unlike Graeme. Jill
On 9 Oct 2006, at 17:49, Maggie Downie wrote:

> Sorry?!
>
> What about it?  It is exactly the same review that dolfrog flagged up.
>
> Maggie
>
> Gillian Clayton <jillclayton at mac.com> wrote:
> What about this review?    Jill
>> Systematic phonics should feature in every child's reading  
>> instruction and it should be part of every literacy teacher's  
>> repertoire, according to a  Government-funded review of research  
>> by academics at the Universities of York and Sheffield. Phonics is  
>> especially helpful to dyslexia children. (Feb 2006)"
>
>>> From <http://www.dyslexia-teacher.com/t2.html>
>
> On 9 Oct 2006, at 13:15, Maggie Downie wrote:
>
>> NOT peer reviewed at all, dolfrog and proably flawed
>>
>>   http://www.rrf.org.uk/Torgersonarticle.pdf
>>
>>   'Peer reviewed' means that it has been published in an academic  
>> journal after scrutiny by other academics in the field.
>>
>>   Maggie
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all  
> new Yahoo! Security Centre.