|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] back in SencoLand | |
|
Maggie Downie
maizie2004 at yahoo.co.uk
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] back in SencoLand | |
|
Luisa, What a lovely story! You described the essentials of synthetic phonics teaching to a T. Starting with the simple, one letter spells one sound, working up to the complex, a combination of letters can spell one sound; making sure the children know this thoroughly (for both 'reading' and writing) and how to use the knowledge to decode (read) words and spell them. The only difference now is that teachers use more engaging resources than a blackboard and chalk! But we all knew how to sit still and listen to our teachers 40 years ago... I imagine that the reason the blackboard and chalk worked is because really all you need to teach it is letters and a way of making them into words. And surely, learning to read must be one of the most intrinsically exciting things that children do at school. Do have a look at www.syntheticphonics.com I'm sure it will all look very familiar to you; the only difference being the few technical terms that are used! Maggie Luisa Pinnell <luisapinnell at hotmail.com> wrote: Hi, Back in the land of lists and timetables after a short spell in paradise! thanks for all the funnies etc. Just one thing: I always feel a bit ignorant when people start talking about different approaches to reading and spelling-in a way, I am still a novice, a relatively new SENCo, doing day -to- day SENCo stuff, but I am really interested in everything to do with reading and spelling. Now I learned to read many years ago in a small place in Southern Europe, in a classroom with 40-odd kids and a teacher, who never got flustered (she was allowed the use of a cane, and indeed any other beating implement she felt like using, but she never did). To begin with, she taught us every letter in the alphabet. We spent weeks copying the letters in a double-lined exercise book; each letter had a little 'tail'. She taught us the sounds that each letter made, and the sounds we could get if we put two letters together. She taught us some particular combinations that were a bit more unusual. I started school aged 7 (like everybody else). My parents and our neighbours did not have books at home, because they could not afford them. Four months after starting school, I read an article in a piece of newspaper. I remember my mother being very pleased. All the children who went to school with me learned to read and write like this. There was a girl who had a lot of problems- I believe she was the first truly dyslexic person that I have ever met. I helped her with her homework and our teacher was very patient. She did o.k. in the end but i shall never forget her worried look... Later, when I was in my late teens, I taught some adults to read (they had never been to school before).The youngest was 20 something and the oldest was 60 . I used the same method and they learned to read and write. My question is: what do you call this way of teaching people to read? I cannot ask my old teacher, she died a while ago. I suppose it is phonics. But can someone explain to me why this sort of thing works in a classroom of 40, with one teacher with a blackboard and a stick of chalk? best regards Luisa _________________________________________________________________ Get Pimped! FREE emoticon packs from Windows Live - http://www.pimpmylive.co.uk --------------------------------- Nervous about who has your email address? Yahoo! Mail can help you win the war against spam. |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |