|
|
|
|
|
| [SENco-forum] learning styles | |
|
SEN at tringham.net
SEN at tringham.net
|
|
| Article: [SENco-forum] learning styles | |
|
It is easy to mix cognitive & learning styles. Whether they are actually 'learning styles' they are definitely the persons preferred way of learning. For example you have heard that those with APD ( or other Speech and communication issues) have great difficulty listening to and understanding what has been said. As do those with dyslexia whose visual processing or understanding of text has been disrupted. These students will definitely have a preferred way of learning and it will not be the more usual classroom auditory or text based lessons if they are to do it efficiently. It may be better to sort sheep from goats based on VAK than by SEN so that the students can learn in the way that best suits them. Schools are becoming more multi-sensory but it still helps to know predominate learning preferences. Beyond the VAK you have those who want to work alone or in groups, with or without peripheral noise or music playing or those who need to move or fiddle in order to learn. It would be impossible to accommodate everything all the time, but knowing why you have success more easily when learning in a particular way can help students work on their weaker areas in a positive way as opposed to attributing their failure solely to themselves rather than a serious clash of 'learning style'. Nobody minds working hard if there is something to gain at the end -but who wants to work hard for nothing? 'Learning style' makes it sound as if there is a choice when for some it is impossible to get input in & sticking in any other way without a huge amount of effort. A quick survey of teachers and EP's would probably find they are auditory learner with good access to text. No wonder it is so hard to change perceptions or ways of working. Many teachers do not take me seriously until they try a few kinaesthetic based strategies be it for writing, reading or spelling etc.,(or other visual or auditory ones) and find the children can suddenly understand the information when presented in a different way. Like smokers, those converted make the best advocates for multisensory teaching or acknowledging that children need different forms of input whether you call that 'learning styles' or not. I am kinaesthetic. I like visual input, but cannot visualise. I have good auditory skills, but I find it hard to drive if music is playing and I cannot 'hear' the car. I learn instantly by seeing & doing, like real life case studies to make sense of things and rely on tactile feedback for touch typing and particularly cooking. There are no recipes that say 'add milk until the mixture resists in a certain way!' Sharon Tringham PS The local secondary enjoyed spending a day looking at this area, sorting the children into VAK, teaching each group appropriately and getting better attention & responses. Teachers were unsure though where to place a child with severe dyslexia wearing all three badges! As a learning experience it was good for staff & students and even if they couldn't keep it up all the time it made them all more aware. -----Original Message----- From: senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk [mailto:senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk]On Behalf Of Philip MacMillan Sent: 13 December 2007 10:32 To: Paul and Philippa Bodien; senco forum Subject: Re: [senco-forum] learning styles Before spending your money on learning style inventories you might want to look at the work of thise who have critiqued the idea of 'learning styles'. There is really very little in the literature to show that they exist and have a significant effect on learning outcomes. Philip EP No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.1/1182 - Release Date: 12/12/2007 11:29 |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |