|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] Expected progress in reading for 'strugglers' at KS3 | |
|
Paul and Philippa Bodien
bodien at gmail.com
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] Expected progress in reading for 'strugglers' at KS3 | |
|
Hi Maggie, Some time back I asked a similar question of Martin Turner. I needed to know when enough was enough for our kids in the Dyslexia Unit. He described a simple to understand pattern that has served our unit well over the years... Take the IQ (this means you need an IQ measure so not always available) then take the mid point between that and 100. So an IQ of 120 gives an expected attainment score of 110 and 80 gives 90... this because of regression to the mean, Martin advised. That gives you the expected attainment score... so standard scores obtained on all tests should be in line with that - within a confidence band. Standard scores are one measure you can use for comparisons of performance over time... percentiles bunch up around the mean and so the intervals are not equal. They are great for understanding the position within a group but not for comparison of perf over time. Any discrepancy more than about 12 standard points from the expected attainment score is significant. It was because of this expected attainment score calculation that I was able to deduce that a Y5 boy had eye movement problems... his word reading and word attack had come within expected levels but his passage comprehension remained stubbornly below expectation when all else was in place (he was compliant in lessons, enjoyed lessons, was trying hard, did all his homework etc). Once his eye movements were brought into function through vision therapy prescribed by Keith Holland, his passage comprehension scores also came with expectations. Without expected attainment scores to point the way he may still have been struggling... Another lad had had his IQ tested at around 85. Then with Occupational Therapy, Omega 3 (Eye-Q) and dyslexia tuition, his scores shot beyond expectations. I asked for a reassessment by the same EP and his IQ had risen so that his attainment scores were in line with the figure... what that pointed out then is that the IQ was masked by the blocks he was experiencing and when we worked on those blocks his IQ was measured at a level that more accurately reflected his ability. Philippa On Dec 17, 2007 12:20 AM, Maggie Downie <maizie2004 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > I wonder if anyone would be able to tell me what would be their, realistic > (as opposed to govt. driven targets), 'expected' rate of progress for > children receiving some sort of reading intervention at KS3, measured either > by the results of standardised tests or in English NC levels. > > The children I work with are all at L3 or below at the end of KS2. Reading > & Comprehension Ages on entry to Y7 are about 9.00 or below. I think > that their progress is generally good, but I don't have any comparable data > to measure it against. I am hoping that some of you good people might have > some ! > > I'm enjoying all the Christmas funnies! > > Maggie > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good > |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |