|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] ASD diagnostic checklist URL | |
|
Olanys at aol.com
Olanys at aol.com
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] ASD diagnostic checklist URL | |
|
Hi Brendan, I was neither poking fun or trivialising autism. I do take exception slightly that you feel linking these characteristics to APD is trivialising them, but when they apply to autism they are not trivial. APD is no less serious or awful than autism and each of these characteristics can apply to APD too. All I'm saying is how easy it is to misdiagnose such conditions as I know for a fact that this has happened. How can testing be truly exhausitive when APD is so little known yet in the UK and children have, and still do, slip through the net..like Graeme's son? I don't doubt that autism exists, I didnl;t say that every child diagnosed with autism had APD. But although people in general accept that autism exists, many do still doubt that APD exists. My point was exactly that these characteristics are not all displayed by normally developing children, children with APD are not normally developing children either and each difficulty can have far-reaching effects both educationally and socially. And they are by no means an exhaustive list of what affects those with APD either, just like autism. People DO blindly accept criteria like this often without questioning them - I feel they should be questioned. If those that diagnose such conditions were aware of APD wouldn't it be better to send these children for (scientifically based) APD testing before labelling them autistic to remove any doubt? If they are then found not to have APD no harm has been done but to live your life labelled as one thing and never knowing it is wrong is, to me, a crime. There is a member of the OldAPDs list (in the US where APD has been recognised for many years but still does not get funding under DSM-IV criteria) who was consigned to a psychiatric hospital for several years and later found to have APD - no psychosis at all. She is a highly gifted visual spatial learner whose crime was that because if her APD she just did not conform to the norm. Parents in the US often accept a DSM-IV classification of any sort, especially autism-despite whether it applies or not, when their child has just APD, simply to be able to get services. Is it so wrong for me not to want that to happen here? Step back and consider it from another side, please. I respect you and your experiences greatly- you should know that, and I thought you knew me better that that too. I would never trivialise SEN of any sort. It isn't a contest of whose condition is the most important... but children with SEN seem to lose all the time because of what has been described on this forum lately as "absolute certainties"... many professionals do not ever look outside their own safety zone, their area of expertise, criteria that fit the box they have learned to recognise and many children do not fit into those neat little boxes and have co-morbid conditions and overlapping charactieristics whixch make diagnosis difficult and often need more than one diagnosis, and so many perents give up after struggling to get one, if they are lucky enough to even get that far. I have rarely come across anyone who has only APD... in fact at the moment I can't recall anyone. Having just any diagnosis is no better than not having a diagnosis, when the diagnosis made is not accurate or complete. We need to avoid that at all costs. Best wishes, Aly Chair Auditory Processing Disorder in the UK/APDUK www.lacewingmultimedia.com/APD.htm www.apduk.org |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |