[senco-forum] Advice needed urgently. Statemented pupil placement at our ...

As to ways to argue against admission;

On 05/05/07 20:33, "Kate Barnes" <kate.senrab at btinternet.com> wrote:
<snipped>
> As to ways to argue against admission;
> My understanding is that you can refuse a child, with or without a statement
> if you don't have a place in the year group. This does not necessarily mean
> the class, but refers to the admission number set for the year.

I understand that the admissions number is not necessarily a stop to a child
with a statement in the way you suggest.

In any event, any argument against placement ought to be supported by
evidence that properly makes the case. Such an approach also ensures that
any suggestion of discrimination or prejudice is avoided.

Me, I prefer Martin's approach earlier in this thread:
>> What would have to be in place to be able to include this youngster without
>> affecting the learning of the other children? Create the theoretical
>> package and if it cannot be put in place it should answer your question.

(Bear in mind that this package would be resource neutral since the cost
would fall upon the LEA, not the school.)

Regards, Mike
-- 
Mike Boyd <mike at green43.demon.co.uk>