|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] Dyslexia - what are the scores on the doors? | |
|
Mmilesep at aol.com
Mmilesep at aol.com
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] Dyslexia - what are the scores on the doors? | |
|
In a message dated 05/11/2007 21:18:30 GMT Standard Time, kngbrndn at aol.com writes: ? LAs will tell you that?this is because more / or all of?their?central SEN funds?are now delegated to schools, and so?more children will?be having there?SEN met at School Action -- including literacy difficulty children. ? In reality LAs (whether or not schools are receiving significantly increased SEN delegated funding through enhanced banding formula)?are setting local general "guidance" criteria, for determining whether a child should be assessed and possibly?statemented, that are so restrictive as to virtually rule out all dyslexic / discalculaic / dyspraxic / high functionong ASD / ADHD / ESBD / language impaired?children. ? In other words virtually all SEN children in mainstream -- no matter how severly they may be struggling, floundering or failing in their local mainstream school.??The CoP criteria?-- that?it becomes?'neccessary' to assess and statement?whenever a?child?despite the school having taken relevant and purposful action, with the support of external specialists, the child still does not make expected progress -- is clearly being flouted nationwide. This is why appeals against refusals to assess and statement children are at an all time high. And why it is reasonable to encourage parents to request an assessment and appeal if refused? -- wherever their child is floundering and coming within the CoP criteria relating to the fact that the school is unable to sufficently meet all of a child's SEN. This CoP criteria?must override all overly restrictive local criteria. ? The green light?for?this nationwide phenomena, was singled in the strategy document issued in 2004 by the DfES "Removing Barriers to Acheivement" which ironically has?triggered a raising of barriers for very many SEN children?-- by encouraging LAs to place less reliance upon statementing (but not at the expense of children's entitlements) and by delegating / devolving more of its central SEN funds to mainstream schools. The bit I've bracketed, seems to be being conveniently overlooked in very many LA areas,?I'm afraid. Brendan King Brendan Have been meaning to ask you this for a while - why so many question marks and big spaces in your contributions - or is it a problem at my end? Martin |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |