|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] [SENco-forum] Speech and languagedifficultiesandexclusions | |
|
dolfrog at dolfrog.org.uk
dolfrog at dolfrog.org.uk
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] [SENco-forum] Speech and languagedifficultiesandexclusions | |
|
Hi Stuart all That link should be APD <http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/pf_article_detail.asp?article_id=18 03> Evaluation to Therapy: The Buffalo Model I will get the hang of this eventually Best wishes dolfrog -----Original Message----- From: senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk [mailto:senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk] On Behalf Of dolfrog at dolfrog.org.uk Sent: 18 April 2008 12:30 To: 'Stuart Lucas'; SEN at tringham.net; 'Becta Senco' Subject: Re: [senco-forum] [SENco-forum] Speech and languagedifficultiesandexclusions Hi Stuart It was the other way around Until 2000 and the ASHA sponsored Bruton Conference We were all talking about Central Auditory Processing Disorder CAPD, well they were in the USA, where it was recognised over 30 years ago. The problem was that during the 1990s some US based audiologists were developing their own so called models of CAPD to best match the redial program that they had qualified and were licensed to provide. Which was almost a license to print money at the expense of those who may have APD, it got so bad that many leading university CAPD professors refused to teach new audiologists on ethical grounds because they just wanted to make money diagnosing CAPD and selling their remedial program to parents etc . Sound familiar there are some dyslexia program like that. So during the late 1990s ASHA set about defining CAPD so that it could conform to the USA disability legislation regarding disability and the provision of Disability support in the education system. The leading lights in this ASHA consultation process, were Jim Jerger, Robert Kieth, Gail D. Chermak, Terri James Bellis, Frank Musiek, ALAN B. GERTNER, and others. The Central part refereed to the Central nervous system, which was the area initially identified to be the cause of these problems. But at the Bruton Conference it was recognised that there were other issues that can cause the same problems such as severe Ear infections such as Glue Ear. So the C was dropped. During the passage of time to 2005 when the first ASHA Technical report were published the C made a re-appearance as (C)APD for continuity. You may find this article useful as it traces the history of APD in the USA and is by Jack Katz. "APD Evaluation to Therapy: The Buffalo Model" /14/2007 Jack Katz, Ph.D., Audiology Online Contributing Editor http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/pf_article_detail.asp?article_id=180 3 In the UK we the Medical Research Council and in Australia were most of research has been post 2000 we are talking only about APD. I very much doubt we will go back to CAPD. Best wishes dolfrog -----Original Message----- From: Stuart Lucas [mailto:lucass at loretto.com] Sent: 18 April 2008 11:25 To: dolfrog at dolfrog.org.uk; SEN at tringham.net; Becta Senco Subject: RE: [senco-forum] [SENco-forum] Speech and language difficultiesandexclusions Hi Dolfrog - Quick Q - 'why has (for some) APD changed to CAPD? Tks Stuart |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |