|
|
|
|
|
| [SENco-forum] Primary Review and VAK | |
|
SEN at tringham.net
SEN at tringham.net
|
|
| Article: [SENco-forum] Primary Review and VAK | |
|
While it may be ideal to activate all 5 regions simultaneously and maybe those who are firing on all cylinders do just this to be the best scientist/thinker of their day, but it is not something that is available to all. My blind friend has no sight at all and has been this way from birth and yet he has no difficulty in understanding science or scientific principles. Perhaps with sight he would have been the greatest scientist ever - who knows. My daughter has dyslexia. As for text she may as well have been blind in the early days. Her inner wiring or multisensory networks, while in place were definitely not working. Again her grasp of science is fine. Helen Keller was missing both sight and sound and yet communication or understanding was well within her grasp. Admittedly these 3 had access to a high level of specialist support (whether working with or without scientific research to back them) and this support was directed at making the most of their other senses and that is what VAK is supposed draw attention to - other ways of learning that make learning more successful. I can definitely say that these would not have picked visual as their preferred method. While researchers come up with a lot that is good, I do sometimes wish that they would stop training spiders to go left or right on command, then rip off their legs and declare the spiders to be deaf when they can no longer move. VAK is one model and not the be all and end all to learning. It has some value in showing teachers there are other ways of teaching than to stand at the front and talk . Of course you could learn if closeted in a dark box with a sound track running , but I cannot imagine it would be ideal for the majority, nor would anyone want to claim that this is what is meant by auditory learning. However there is a place for blocking out some distractions, or indeed, building some in like fidgeting or chewing if some find it helpful. Auditory is not my preferred method of learning (being 'kinaesthetic'), but it was ideal last thing at night to listen to a tape recorder in the dark when revising for my exams. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk [mailto:senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk]On Behalf Of Mary Kelly Sent: 10 February 2008 16:37 To: 'Becta Senco' Subject: [senco-forum] Primary Review and VAK Here's a little more flesh on the ideas I paraphrased earlier - from the Conclusions section (p20) of Goswami, U. and Bryant, P. (2007) 'Children's Cognitive Development and Learning' (Primary Review Research Survey 2/1a), Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education: "Learning by the brain depends on the development of multi-sensory networks of neurons distributed across the entire brain. For example, a concept in science may depend upon neurons being simultaneously active in visual, spatial, memory, deductive and kinaesthetic regions, in both brain hemispheres. Ideas such as left-brain/right-brain learning, or unisensory 'learning styles' (visual, auditory OR kinaesthetic) are NOT supported by the brain science of learning." Mary No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date: 09/02/2008 11:54 |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |