|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] Acceleread/write | |
|
Mmilesep at aol.com
Mmilesep at aol.com
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] Acceleread/write | |
|
In a message dated 08/01/2008 12:49:34 GMT Standard Time, Helen.Norris at swaveseyvc.cambs.sch.uk writes: We are just coming to the end of a four week intervention using Acceleread/write with some very weak year 7 pupils. When can we repeat the intervention with the same pupil? How long a gap would members leave before repeating the intervention and what would they use with the pupils in the meantime? When we first put this intervention together I had hoped that the children would, once basic literacy skills had been improved, move on to the more interesting and relevant curriculum-based and project-based work still using a talking word processor. Most schools, pleased with the results of the "remedial" aspect worked in this way again with different children. I know of little qualitative evaluation using the talking WP to support writing. For the same reasons as above I know of few children who have had a second go of 4 weeks and how they have got on. The only data I do have is of a boy (Yr 3) who had more sessions about 9 months later and improved by another 37 months in reading. The 20 sessions over 20 days (4 weeks) was somewhat arbitrary but satisfied the criteria of short and frequent. I asked for this arrangement to be adhered to during the evaluation in an attempt to control some of the variables. 3 sessions a week for 6 weeks might be just as effective. Try it and see. If anyone has any data or info on further sessions I would be interested to hear of it. The most recent data I have received was from Lancs and showed an average increase in reading of 14.7 months after the initial twenty 20 minute sessions. More information from _Talksystem at aol.com_ (mailto:Talksystem at aol.com) Financial interest declared. Martin |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |