|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] Re: Devon SEN Pupils face 'Bleak Future' | |
|
Biff Crabbe
ba at biffc.vispa.com
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] Re: Devon SEN Pupils face 'Bleak Future' | |
|
'The DCFS said that, for an LA like ours we should have 360.' The first bit that bothers me is that the DCSF (Schools come before Families, because it's much more difficult to identify quantitative measures to show how Government has improved standards in Families) should see fit to tell you how many special school places an Authority 'like yours' should have available. 'SEN kids will contribute exactly what to the economy?' Now there is one way in which SEN children contribute to the economy greatly. Employment. Governments employ rafts of people (including you and me both) both to invent, maintain and administer the sprawling machinery of legislation, guidance and initiatives, and to work with the kids and the adults with SEN themselves (although there seem to be more combined inventors, system maintenance people and administrators than there are workers with people). Think of all those people employed within the DCSF who crunch data to produce pearls such as, 'statistically, based on all of the data, and never mind how many children you have with SEN, you should be expected to cater for this number of children, because that's what the computer says.' What a great system. Think of those who are paid through taxes to write the programs for the computer; all those public servants who manage complex SEN systems; think of the legal profession and the employment opportunities and revenue that it garners through the existence of SEN children. You may well be right that the G + T kids are the future prosperity of the country, unless of course they decide to emigrate, and always assuming that the education system also produces people to operate the bright ideas and make them work. Brian - it's been SO dull without you. And didn't that Martin have it coming? Biff ----- Original Message ----- From: "brian hepburn" <hepburnbrian at hotmail.com> To: <senco-forum at lists.becta.org.uk> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:41 PM Subject: RE: [senco-forum] Re: Devon SEN Pupils face 'Bleak Future' The reason there's such a big spend on maintained and non-maintained special schools is that mainstream schools can't or won't meet those kids' needs. There is a recognition from DCFS that special schools are necessary to meet the needs of a small number of kids. I don't think it's a great secret to say that in my neck of the woods we currently have 550 kids in 5 special schools. The DCFS said that, for an LA like ours we should have 360. So why do we have ?% (I can't be bothered to work it out) more places currently? Inevitably, it's a long, complex story with an historical context that blurs into the mists of time. But, bottom line, mainstream schools are going to have to pick up many more, in order to free up places in special schools who will ( and indeed are) picking up kids with more severe and complex needs. This wil reduce the numbers going out of city. Will mainstream Heads and staff bleat about this? You bet. Is it fair? Answers on a postcard. Did I read that staff are telling parents to send their kids elsewhere to get a better deal on SEN? How humiliating for those staff. They're saying to parents, I'm not able to teach your child. From the LA's point of view, it's a tough one to have land on your plate, when parents have been told their kid's not wanted at school X, try school Y instead. Try building bridges there. Brian Oh, did someone say G + T kids can get on with it and we should concentrate resources on SEN? Is this the same argument that states dustbin persons shouldn't subsidise students through Higher Ed? They can pay for their own education through loans? The G + T kids are the future prosperity of the country, SEN kids will contribute exactly what to the economy? What are the budgets given to support SEN and G + T? Maybe if they were reversed, the net effect would make us an economy fit for purpose with the dog wagging the tail, for a change. > To: Senco-forum at lists.becta.org.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:57:00 -0500> From: kngbrndn at aol.com> CC: > Subject: [senco-forum] Re: Devon SEN Pupils face 'Bleak Future'> > I guess this will be a familiar story nationwide:> > > > > > > SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FACING BLEAK FUTURE > > > > 11:40 - 10 January 2008 > > > > > The future of Devon children with special educational needs (SEN) is "bleak" because of a lack of resources and underfunding, says a new report. > > > > Now, councillors have ordered an urgent review of education for SEN children after discovering spiralling costs and wide differences in provision across the county.> > > > There are currently just under 19,000 SEN children in Devon, 19 per cent of the school population.> > > > > And the cost of providing education and support to them is £35m a year, 11 per cent of the school budget, rising from £27m in 2006/6 and £24m in 04/5.> > > > Officers say trying to pay for SEN services is becoming their biggest issue and they are unsure whether they will be able the balance the books in the future.> > > > Devon's 10 special schools are costing £14.7m this financial year - £18,829 per pupil - and the bill for sending Devon children to independent special schools has arisen from £4.4m in 2004/5 to £7.4m in 2007/8.> > > > Currently, 113 children attend independent special schools daily, 27 weekly, 31 yearly and 15 termly at a cost of £7,412,786.> > > > In future more children will be sent to mainstream schools.> > > > The children and young people's department has overspent by £4.5m this year, partly because it is paying for some SEN youngsters to be educated elsewhere.> > > > A Devon County Council task group found numbers of SEN pupils varied from under two per cent in some schools to up to 60 per cent in others, with the UK average 20 per cent.> > > > The average cost of sending an SEN child in Devon to an independent school was £33,988 a year.> > > > It said there were also problems with schools not being prepared to take significant numbers of SEN pupils so children ended up going to independent special schools at far greater expense.> > > > The task group - councillors Saxon Spence, Roger Croad, Andrea Davis, Anne Fry and Vanessa Newcombe - spent the summer speaking to teachers, council officers, parents and children, visiting schools all around the county.> > > > Their report said investment in special needs provision would save the county council money in the long-term.> > > > The task group said it was "concerned" at the high differences in SEN numbers in different schools.> > > > It said: "Members questioned whether schools that had low numbers were avoiding taking their share of special needs pupils, or that there were different measures being utilised for establishing whether a young person had a special need."> > > > Some schools with a good reputation were "overloaded".> > > > Despite having to meet the cost of transport themselves, some parents were persuaded to send their children to schools out of their catchment area by teachers who recommended them as being excellent for SEN. In line with the law, most children with SEN were taught in mainstream classes but resources were stretched and council officers were finding it hard to train teachers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________> AOL's new homepage has launched. Take a tour at http://info.aol.co.uk/homepage/ now. _________________________________________________________________ Telly addicts unite! http://www.searchgamesbox.com/tvtown.shtml -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.1/1220 - Release Date: 11/01/2008 18:09 |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |