becta logo
[senco-forum] [SENco-forum] FW: exam scribes

Sheridan Sharp1 sheridan.sharp1 at btinternet.com
Wed May 21 17:34:21 BST 2008

Article: [senco-forum] [SENco-forum] FW: exam scribes

I can sympathise with your daughter's case. I frequwntly have pupils who are
far from fluent readers and  get scores only just outside the  criteria for
dispensation. The problem is that no matter where the cut off point is
placed some child will just miss out.


On 21/05/2008 15:09, "SEN at tringham.net" <SEN at tringham.net> wrote:

> I believe it means that they use a scribe for that subject & for internal
> exams.
> 
> More complicated is my daughter who uses a computer scribe/reader in English
> i.e. uses TextHELP as a normal way of working and the use of which makes her
> equal to her peers, but, in order to use this is in GCSE exams has to comply
> with the rule of reading/spelling below 85.  She scored 89.
> 
>  Strictly speaking she now does not qualify for a 'scribe', but without it
> her computer to order thoughts/re-order paragraphs etc., she is up the creek
> without a paddle.  I feel a DDA case coming on.
> 
> Sharon Tringham
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk
> [mailto:senco-forum-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk]On Behalf Of Frank Bruce
> Sent: 21 May 2008 14:52
> To: Senco Forum Posts
> Subject: [senco-forum] FW: exam scribes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Frank Bruce [mailto:fbruce at yellow.esinet.org.uk]
> Sent: 20 May 2008 16:20
> To: Senco Forum Posts (senco-forum at lists.becta.org.uk)
> Subject: exam scribes
> 
> I wonder how people interpret the JCQ regulation that
> 
> "The provision of a scribe should reflect the candidates normal way of
> working, except in cases where temporary injury gives rise to the need for a
> scribe."
> 
> I have always read this to mean that pupils get  a scribe for internal
> exams.  I would be amazed if it were meant to be read strictly; To mean that
> only pupils who normally have a scribe for EVERYTHING qualify.
> What do people think?
> Thanks
> Frank Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1457 - Release Date: 20/05/2008
> 16:45
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1457 - Release Date: 20/05/2008
> 16:45
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1457 - Release Date: 20/05/2008
> 16:45
> 
> 
> 
> 




  Main Becta Site  | Return to top