|
|
|
|
|
| [senco-forum] [SENCo-forum] empirical research | |
|
Philip MacMillan
P.Macmillan at exeter.ac.uk
|
|
| Article: [senco-forum] [SENCo-forum] empirical research | |
|
If all Educational research comes down to individual differences of opinion, and I must admit it has in the past and is still doing so then we are going to go round in circles as we seem to do. Even in the ivory towers egos and career aspirations rule the roost and you must not rock the boat, even though it is heading for the rocks with the crew asleep at the wheel. The Rose Review laid out the consensus of what works, the primary strategy is revamped, SP given priority and then the government brings back Reading Recovery, the madmen are truly running the asylum! The problem with most educational research is that it is either qualitative or correlational, very little of it is quantitative and empirical. It also tends to be done once and not replicated yet on the basis of this educational policies are built and put into practice. If you read the likes of Brooks on the matter you will find that results are often reported in ways that do not allow meaningful comparisons between teaching methods, Solity has a lot to say on this and it makes good sense. Another problem lies in the inability of educational researchers to support each other, rather they tend to attack each other. Some few years ago Solity set up a good early reading scheme in the S. of England, it was successful over the long term in schools that were considered to be less than effective and which were by and large in deprived areas. It worked well, what did HMG do, why they ignored it and kept on with the NLS. There have been other good programmes developed and then evaluated but the system seems to shy away from accepting anything that reeks of numbers or rigour, and I speak from experience. The move away from testing (I am no fan of SATs as Tymms and the National Statistical Office have shown that they are essentially invalid measures) and towards 'child focussed' teaching sounds good and I do think we start some children too early on formal learning, however if we abandon testing how will we know what is working and what is not. The problem with 'child focussed' is that the problem of a child not learning then becomes an internal fault in the child not the external environment they are exposed to. We have been here before, why are we going back? If we are going to test children, and we should to make sure they are progressing, it should be with properly set up and validated norm referenced tests so that like can be measured with like. Philip EP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maggie Downie" <maizie2004 at yahoo.co.uk> To: <kngbrndn at aol.com>; <P.Macmillan at exeter.ac.uk>; <lucass at loretto.com>; <senco-forum at lists.becta.org.uk>; <SEN at tringham.net>; <dolfrog at dolfrog.org.uk>; "Sheridan" <sheridan.sharp1 at btinternet.com> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:43 AM Subject: RE: [senco-forum] [SENCo-forum] empirical research There may never be consensus, but there can be convergence. It is the convergence demonstrated by replication of results that leads to the acceptance of a theory as being probably correct. Maggie --- On Sun, 25/5/08, Sheridan <sheridan.sharp1 at btinternet.com> wrote: > From: Sheridan <sheridan.sharp1 at btinternet.com> > Subject: RE: [senco-forum] [SENCo-forum] empirical research > To: kngbrndn at aol.com, maizie2004 at yahoo.co.uk, P.Macmillan at exeter.ac.uk, > lucass at loretto.com, senco-forum at lists.becta.org.uk, SEN at tringham.net, > dolfrog at dolfrog.org.uk > Date: Sunday, 25 May, 2008, 9:30 AM > Very true Brandon. Every research is analysed and reviewed > by individuals > who will put their own interpretation on what they read, > see etc. There will > never be a total consensus of opinion on anything. > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1464 - Release > Date: 24/05/2008 > 08:56 __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |