[senit] House of Lords meeting

Well said Martin!
I hope it is going to get an even wider audience than SENIT members
Cheers
Judith

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Judith Stansfield
SEN ICT Consultant
BDANTC (Associate member)
Farm Cottage, 24 East Road, Melsonby,Richmond DL10 5NF
stass at onyxnet.co.uk 
01325 718139   07990572365
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: senit-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk
[mailto:senit-bounces at lists.becta.org.uk] On Behalf Of Lesley Rahamin
Sent: 31 January 2007 15:27
To: senit at lists.becta.org.uk
Subject: [senit] House of Lords meeting

Hello SENIT members
Yesterday I attended a reception at the House of Lords hosted by
Baroness 
Walmsley and organised by Martin Littler and Inclusive Technology.  The 
meeting was to raise awareness of the decrease in support for SEN and
ICT. 
I think we should be grateful that Martin has raised this issue at such
a 
high level.  I have asked Martin's permission to share his speech with
SENIT 
members and he has agreed.  The text is below.
Lesley Rahamin
SENIT Co-Moderator
lesley.rahamin at btinternet.com

The House of Lords   Tuesday 30th January

Introduction - Martin Littler

I would like to thank the many members of the House of Lords and the
Members 
of Parliament who are attending this debate today.
Sitting alongside you are over ninety special educators and people with 
assistive technology expertise, quite a few with more than twenty years 
experience in this field. They were in at the very beginning, when
teachers 
and government first realised the huge potential of new technology to
help 
learners with severe and complex special needs to communicate, learn,
and 
live independently.
Twenty years ago, when I started as Director of Manchester SEMERC, 
practically every LEA had an expert SEN/IT Advisory Teacher. These were 
supported by four regional resource centres like mine, and a National 
Special Needs Software Unit to develop the software they needed. None of

this exists now.
In addition, children without speech and with other communication
handicaps 
had the two ACE Centres offering specialist support too. This structure
was 
set up by far-sighted officials at the Department of Education.
This era, twenty years ago, gave rise to much of the expertise we have
in 
this room today. And most of the resources we have to hand.
This era carried us forward to today. It gave many of us our start. One
by 
one the initiatives were withdrawn but we have coasted on. Today it
seems to 
me the brakes have been applied and we are about to go into reverse.
Expertise in this field has disappeared from QCA, then from the DfES
and, 
last year, we even looked like losing the Inclusion Team at Becta. A
team we 
looked to for leadership and our voice in Government.
In the last few years Special Education seems to have been
systematically 
omitted from every Government education initiative that involves ICT.
In the latest evaluation of Curriculum Online, for instance, Secondary 
Schools are mentioned 173 times, Primary Schools 168 times, and Special 
Schools not once.
The New Opportunities Fund provided ICT training for every teacher, but
the 
needs of Special School teachers were initially omitted entirely.
And by March 2008, we are told, every child must have access to a
Learning 
Platform. As nothing currently available has any relevance to children
with 
Severe and Complex special needs, what will be available for them? I
have 
asked this question of both the DfES and Becta. Neither was able to tell
me. 
"Every child" just does not include these learners.
Nowhere is the lack of priority more damaging than in the help we
provide to 
children with communication difficulties.
Having no speech is one of the biggest barriers a child can face;
barring 
their path to learning, making independent choices, or living life to
the 
full.
The early progress made in this field was spectacular. Children could be

given a voice and the ability to write and communicate - even though, as
is 
often the case, they have additional crippling physical and sensory 
handicaps.
When reporting on SEN last year, the Parliamentary Education and Skills 
Committee said that children were being failed by a system "not fit for 
purpose" they may have had these learners in mind.
The Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists now speak of the 
"devastating de-prioritisation of speech and language therapy services"
with 
78% of speech therapists having their budgets cut last year and 80% of
newly 
qualified speech therapists failing to find a job.
These children are losing the therapy they need and the Communication 
Devices too. I have an advanced draft of a devastating report from
Scope, 
which concludes:
"It is of great concern that the government has no plans . to provide 
communication equipment to children . who need it to be able to express 
their needs, wishes and views... This position seems contrary to much of

government's rhetoric about inclusion, reducing disadvantage, and
enabling 
'choice and voice'.
Over the top? Well last year the Government finally withdrew funding
from 
the two ACE Centres who advise on the communication aids children need.
This 
saved a measly £340,000.
At the same time they axed the CAP programme, costing just £5 million a 
year, which provided communication aids on permanent loan to children. 
Nothing replaced the programme.
A House of Lords ruling has meant that local authorities can now take 
resource implications into account when considering their duty to
provide 
speech aids. So if a local authority is short of funds then a child will

literally not get a voice.
It is clear to me that children with Severe and Complex Special Needs, 
including children without speech, have just disappeared from the
Government's 
agenda.
I would like to see them back on that agenda. 