[senit] IWB vs plasma

Sorry to go round old ground again, but a special school I support (P1/2

Biggest + for the plasma is better access.  Rear projection does not move up 
and down so easily and we find ours difficult to get wheelchairs up to, it 
doesnt go so low either.

Also is you move the back projection around, you can knock the mirrors, blow 
a bulb etc.  As the plasma is an overlay it can move a little but definatly 
more robust

Also it takes less space.

I would choose plasma over back projection any time, and we have both in 
school.

Alison Paul
Assistant Head
Brimble Hill
Swindon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "sally millar" <sally.millar at ed.ac.uk>
To: <senit at lists.becta.org.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:41 AM
Subject: [senit] IWB vs plasma

> Sorry to go round old ground again, but a special school I support (P1/2 
> class, (small kids, mostly non- mobile) is being pressurised by 
> technicians into an rear projection inter active whiteboard instead of a 
> big plasma screen from Inclusive. Anyone got first-hand experience and can 
> list the arguments for/against?
> many thanks
> Sally Millart
> -- 
>
> Sally Millar FRCSLT, M.Ed,
> Senior Research Fellow / Joint Coordinator
> CALL Centre
> University of Edinburgh           Direct Line +44 131 651 6077
> Paterson's Land Office +44 131 651 6236
> Holyrood Road                 Fax +44 131 651 6234
> Edinburgh EH8 8AQ
> Scotland, UK
>
>
> Web: http://www.callcentrescotland.org.uk/
> -- 
>
> Sally Millar FRCSLT, M.Ed,
> Senior Research Fellow / Joint Coordinator
> CALL Centre
> University of Edinburgh           Direct Line +44 131 651 6077
> Paterson's Land Office +44 131 651 6236
> Holyrood Road                 Fax +44 131 651 6234
> Edinburgh EH8 8AQ
> Scotland, UK
>
>
> Web: http://www.callcentrescotland.org.uk/
>
> 