|
|
|
|
|
| [senit] iwbs vs interactive plasma screens | |
|
Sean O'Sullivan
sean.frankwise at easynet.co.uk
|
|
| Article: [senit] iwbs vs interactive plasma screens | |
|
As with the others who have responded earlier, plasma screens are much better than IWB, and as always, it's not just because they address issues that are more prominent for users with special needs (ie shadow), they are just far higher quality images and much better able to cope in standard classroom environments. Apart from shadow, no risk of a pupil turning and staring into a very bright projector either. You may well get some responses regarding back-projected IWBs too, and these are certainly better than standard IWBs. Similarly, the newer short throw projectors overcome quite a bit of the shadow issue, but it's not a total solution. As far as height adjustment and accessibility for users in wheelchairs goes, yes these are extremely important, and in my view should be crucial considerations when any school is investing, not just special schools. Before Inclusive Technology brought their product to the market we had recognised that this was what we needed, and we initially designed and built our own, including the facility to swivel the screen off to the side if using it with individual pupils rather than a small group or whole class. Our view now is that the critical features are a combination of height adjustability and spacing from the wall, so we went to Loxit, who manufacture the Hi-Lo mechanism, and they built an adapted version for us which we felt allowed children to sit face-on in their wheelchair, or be in long-sitting position with the screen down very close to the floor. Or of course in a standing frame of tilt table with the screen much higher up. Whatever position is valuable for their physical development, while they get on with some engaging and motivating work. http://www.parkroadict.co.uk/Site/School_Developments.html Regards, Sean O'Sullivan sean.frankwise at easynet.co.uk Headteacher Frank Wise School, Banbury http://www.frankwise.oxon.sch.uk http://www.parkroadict.co.uk On 24 Jun 2008, at 18:40, david fettes wrote: > hi I was looking at the inclusive site on their interactive plasma > screens. It seems they don't have the problem of shadow . Are they > really problem-free in the SLD school? So will schools replace their > iwbs with interactive plasma screens? We certainly have problems > with the height of iwbs - some of which could not be rectified. We > have a couple of height adjustable iwbs and they do not need > recalibrating at all. We have some very small students and some very > tall ones. Another thing with iwbs is how some students in > wheelchairs can't reach the board face on. The height adjustable > plasma screens don't look like they will let the wheelchair go under > the board any more than height adjust iwbs do? The pics of > interactive plasma screens -is the abbreviation ips? look to be > smaller than typical iwbs? which could be a disadvantage? if anyone > knows any further advantages and disadvantages please let me know > thanks > David |
|
| Main Becta Site | | Return to top |